La liberté d'expression est menacée
L'aĝe de la pensée criminelle a commencé, la censure est présente et on voudrait vous inculquer certaines "vérités", quitte à utiliser des menaces et l'emprisonnement. Tel est la réalité, que vous l'aimiez ou pas. La liste d'articles ci-dessous vont vous apporter de nombreux exemples concrets.
Il y a un guerre qui a lieu présentement pour votre esprit, mais la plupart n'en sont pas conscients. La guerre du savoir et de l'information. Le savoir est aussi une arme.
So it's official. Thought crimes in the
Desperation on the cusp of madness. The holocaust has become the new religion for the new Dark ages, complete with burning of the heretics.
Truth needs no laws to support it. Truth has facts and logic to support it and facts and logic are enough. In the absence of facts and logic, coercion must be used. From Galileo to Zundel, only lies and liars have resorted to the courts to enforce adherence to dogma.
Nothing so much as the extreme methods defenders of the official version resort to calls into doubt the validity of their view of history. After all, one does not see jail recommended for those who insist Elvis is still alive. People who claim to see Bigfoot are not prosecuted in a court of law. Only in the case of the history of WW2 are those who dare question what they have been taught by a government of proven liars hunted down by mobs screaming, "BURN THE HERETIC! BURN THE HERETIC!"
Jailing Zundel was a very foolish thing to do. The inevitable result will be that more and more people will want to know what it is he wrote that caused such an uproar. Zundel's writings and videos, already all over the internet, will draw new interest and study, and one and only one conclusion will be possible. Zundel is in jail because he raised questions that the defenders of the orthodoxy have no answers for, other than chains and truncheons.
UN Adopts Resolution Condemning Holocaust Denial
The brief text simply "condemns without any reservation any claim that Elvis is still alive."
That a resolution is well-intended does not make it wise. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And this resolution is very unwise. It is an attack on free expression - at a time when that is under threat from many quarters. Free expression is a unique and primary good in free societies; it's the oxygen that sustains other freedoms. You must therefore have very good reasons for restricting it by law.
Truth needs no laws to support it. Truth has evidence, facts, hard scientific proof to back it up. Truth can stand alone. Throughout history, from Galileo to Zundel, from the Holy Inquisition to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, only lies and liars have resorted to the courts to enforce adherence to declared dogma.
There is no law making it a crime to claim the sun rises in the west. People who insist Elvis is still alive are not sent to jail. Prison does not hold a cell ready for those who claim to have seen Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster. Only in this one unique part of history is the mere asking of a question grounds for prosecution. If ones dares mention that the soap and lampshade stories were hoaxes, one can be sent to jail, no matter that the soap and lampshade stories WERE hoaxes and frauds. Holocaust questioning has been made such a serious crime than even truth will not be allowed as a defense.
History is full of genocides, and in all those crimes the victims scream out for a fuller examination of that which was done to them. All those crimes, save one. In the case of the Holocaust, it is the purported victims themselves who most argue that the facts never be examined closely.
In a world where we know that we were lied into the war in
I suspect you will not see the mainstream media shouting "Freedom of speech" in this case.
Future history will recall Ernst Zundel in the same breath with Galileo and Giordano Bruno, while already the names of their persecutors are forgotten.
Truth needs no law to enforce it. Nobody needs a law to know that there is just one sun at the center of the solar system. Nobody needs a law to force them to understand that two hydrogen atoms plus one oxygen atom makes up a molecule of water. Nobody needs a law to force them to understand that the acceleration of gravity is a constant. Truth is like that, obvious to all.
Throughout history, laws that punished ideas were used to support lies, not truth. Galileo was punished by law of his day for daring to suggest that the Sun was the center of the solar system. The law protected the lie that the Earth was the center of the universe. The lie that the Earth was the center of the universe NEEDED laws to protect it because there was no evidence to support that claim. In the middle ages, laws that condemned accused witches to horrific deaths were matched with laws that made it illegal to question the reality of witches. The claim that witches were real NEEDED a law to protect it, because there was no evidence that witches were riding their broomsticks up over the top of our homes or turning themselves into black cats.
Truth needs no laws to support it. Only lies require laws to force them upon the public.
I can think of nothing more dangerous to the world than this odious attempt to lead the world into a new dark age where fear rules fact and reason.
Sylvia Stolz, who represented Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel at his trial, also was banned from practicing law for five years.
Now, how does
Not since the days of the Nazis has
Truth needs no laws to support it. Truth survives re-examination. Truth survives questioning. Truth survives verification. Throughout history, from Galileo to Zundel, only lies and liars resort to the courts to enforce adherence to dogma.
Do people who think Elvis is still alive face arrest? Do people who claim to have seen Bigfoot have their lives destroyed? Do people who claim to have taken a ride in an alien spaceship languish in prisons? Only in this one area of inquiry does the mere asking of a question bring the full weight of the legal system down upon ones shoulders. Only in this one area are you commanded to believe as you are told without question, with disobedience to be severely punished.
There is nothing new about genocide. It has happened far too often throughout history. But with genocide, the surviving victims usually WANT further examination of the crime. The surviving victims WANT research. The surviving victims WANT all possible evidence unearthed. Only with the history of WW2 are the purported victims seen to fight as hard as possible the examination of the actual evidence connected to their claims.
It is nothing so much as the behavior of the defenders of the orthodoxy that casts doubt on the veracity of their claims. They act as if they have something to hide.
You can say what you like in the
One of the myths that has been perpetrated on the world is that only Jews are semites. This is totally inaccurate. Unfortunately, the ADL (the Anti-Defamation League) has made a fortune in donations and has conned most media networks and most people in the world into believing this untruth.
A Jewish group is calling for the firing of an outspoken CNN anchor, Lou Dobbs, after he accused advocates for illegal immigrants of using propaganda techniques employed by Nazi Germany.
"We own the trademark on 'Nazi' and nobody can use it except us!"
The ultimate purpose of this campaign is obviously to silence critics of
According to Zuroff, the notion that Jewish identity is “locked into” the Holocaust and causes resentment, coupled with the statement that “
A German dog called Adolf who salutes like a Nazi on command is today looking for a new home after his right-wing owner was sent to jail.
Don't the Germans have real problems to deal with? Or is the country running so smoothly they have to look for things to do?
B'Nai Brith has just declared that teachers no longer have a private life. Paul Fromm lost his teaching certificate not because he did anything wrong in the classroom, but because he has an opinion that B'Nai Brith does not agree with.
The desire to control both past and present is, of course, a common feature of dictatorships. This can be done through propaganda, distorting the truth or suppressing the facts. Anyone in
Which brings us to laws punishing th asking of any questions about the holocaust. According to the Los Angeles Times, any nation which has such laws must be a dictatorship.
Associated Press president Tom Curley says his news organization does not buy the government's argument that one of its photographers arrested in
The French alternative website Alterinfo.net is threatened with closing down as they face legal complaints and accusations of "antisemitism" by the Zionist lobby.
The French associative AlterInfo news agency is facing what it qualifies as a "new attempt of intimidation and destabilization".
ADL puts pressure on search engines like Google to filter out websites which criticize Zionism or homosexuality. So far, it has not succeeded. Recently, Google's Israeli representative, Meir Brand, flatly repulsed ADL requests to ban internet criticism of Zionism. (link to article) ADL has been similarly rebuffed in the United States.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution declares “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
However—in open and deviantly proud defiance of American tradition—the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and other private Jewish pressure groups loyal to a foreign nation—Israel—have achieved special influence in the public arena and are thus able to go beyond the purview of the First Amendment in time and again attempting to suppress (often successfully) the rights of Americans outlined in the First Amendment.