L'Autre Monde: liens pour l'émission du 9 septembre 2007- Les liens concernant l'Iran
Pour écouter, simplement cliquer sur le lien;
Pour télécharger, faite un clique droit puis “enregistrer la cible sous…”
- 9 septembre 2007: Agression en préparation contre l'Iran
- Vous pouvez aller sur le nouveau site MyPodcast pour L'Autre Monde qui vous permet d'écouter ou sauvegarder facilement directement sur le site:
Liens relatifs à l'émission du 9 septembre 2007:
Explorez les liens par rapport à l'agression fort possible de l'Iran, à coups de bombes nucléaires s'il le faut...
Israël viole l’espace aérien de
"We are above the law, putz!"
Israel says it prefers to let the international community confront Iran's nuclear ambitions, but a lone Israeli attack is not out of the question.
This event could have simply been to provoke
Syria and Iran have a mutual defense pact, which would mean that
Also, notice the way in which Mr. Inbar expresses as a almost a given how much Israel is counting on our kids to fight, get maimed, and die for Israel's geopolitical agenda.
Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Wednesday that the Israel Defense Forces was moving closer to an extensive ground action in the Gaza Strip, "in order to halt the rocket fire and the strengthening [of militant organizations]", Barak told his senior staff and the heads of the military industries. The statement came a few hours after the security cabinet decided not to significantly alter the IDF's actions in the
However, I wouldn't want to bet against such a draft if in fact a major military action against
Looks like the
Agression de l’Iran:
In 2002, in the runup to the war against
In 2007, in the run-up to the coming war against
Vastly experienced European diplomats, from
And the 110th will simply repeat, ad nauseum, their "stupid congress member's trick" of rolling over and playing dead while this happens.
And of course, the potential military repercussions from Iran against our troops in Iraq and elsewhere don't really matter that much to them because after all, it's generally other people's kids going the fighting, getting maimed and dying; not theirs.
Cheney's likely motivation for issuing such instructions to his think-tank allies would be to win an inter-administration battle over the future of
"It will be coordinated with the American Enterprise Institute, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, Fox, and the usual suspects, writes Rubin, "It will be heavy sustained assault on the airwaves, designed to knock public sentiment into a position from which a war can be maintained. Evidently they don’t think they’ll ever get majority support for this—they want something like 35-40 percent support, which in their book is “plenty.”
The issuance of orders for Neo-Con mass media arms to push for an assault on Iran also puts the U.S. on red alert for a terror attack, whether real or manufactured, which Dick Cheney has already promised will immediately be blamed on Iran no matter who the real culprits are.
These lunatics desperately need a diversion from how really badly the war in
So what do they intend to do, take collective responsibility and get our troops home quickly?
Of course they won't: they're simply going to start yet another war.
And for all of Bush's blather yesterday in Iraq about how valuable our troops are for their sacrifices, he and his minions are perfectly happy in bringing thousands more to permanent injury and death to bring about the neocons' geopolitical agenda.
Michael Ledeen -- who once told me that he only supported the Iraq War because it provided momentum and pre-positioning of American military forces to then go after Iran -- is not going to feel self-actualized until America unleashes a considerable portion of its arsenal against the nation and people of Iran.
Michael Ledeen is one of the men the Italian Parliament concluded authored the forged Niger documents use to help sell the lie that Iraq had nuclear weapons.
President George W. Bush's speech Tuesday lays out the Bush/Cheney plan to attack
It's not about putative Iranian "weapons of mass destruction" - not even ostensibly. It is about the requirement for a scapegoat for US reverses in
With his term almost over, the danger of a world catastrophe seems closer with every passing day. The man literally wants to go out with a 'big bang'...
Note the arrogant assumption that
For months – perhaps even a couple of years – I have been downplaying the likelihood that Bush would be so foolish as to start a war with Iran, especially in light of how much more difficult such a war would be than the war on Iraq and how thinly the military is stretched.
Over the last few weeks, however, I have to admit I've become a bit less certain.
The United States will be ready to launch a missile attack on Iran's nuclear facilities as soon as early this month, perhaps "from
I do not trust this focus on the 6th. The attack could come as soon as tonight. The attack could be delayed well into April to wear down
There is no doubt war is coming. But what day it will start is not set in stone.
Indeed, it seems Cheney has already chosen the casus belli for such an attack – a provocation that we will doubtless see occurring any day now.
Deep in the bowels of the CIA, someone must be nervously, but very privately, wondering: "Whatever happened to those nuclear blueprints we gave to the Iranians?"
Or was it a setup to justify invasion.
British officials have allowed the export to
Can you say "Frame up?"
Can you say "Frame up?"
Can you say "Frame up?"
Looks like we are getting set up for the false flag that will launch the invasion of
Le programme nucléaire irannien:
The U.N. nuclear agency said Thursday that Iran was producing less nuclear fuel than expected and praised Tehran for "a significant step forward" in explaining past atomic actions that have raised suspicions.
We saw this leading up to
U.S. diplomats have seized on the confirmation provided by an IAEA report finalized last week that Iran is continuing to enrich uranium and to build what would be a plutonium-making heavy-water reactor—in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions, as well as those of the IAEA's own board. However, the same report declared that
Iran welcomed the report, contending that it showed
"But, but, but, they are THINKING about nuclear weapons, dammit! WE can bomb them for having bad thoughts!!!" -- Official White Horse Souse
President Hamid Karzai of
Robert M. Gates, who was in
Absolutely nothing this admnistration is saying can get traction in terms of anyreal, tangible reason to "strike"
So, what's next?
Well, let's see :Olmert is due to meet with Bush in
Cheney has been doing everything possible to push some kind of military 'solution' on
Of course, there's also that little issue of Bush having pledged
Kuwait, a staunch US ally, said on Monday it would not allow the
Translation: it is very clear to the Kuwaiti government that there will be a US-led strike against