Émission de radio L'Autre Monde

Pour écouter, cliquez sur l'image! ..............................................
Suivez aussi L'Autre Monde sur YouTube et sur Twitter

dimanche 11 mars 2007

9/11 - Explosions/ Bin Laden/ Avions détournés/ Pré-connaissance




9/11 - Explosions/ Bin Laden/ Avions détournés/ Pré-connaissance


Le 11 septembre était-il un travail d’initié ?

par Kim Bredesen

Le 22 aout 2006


Le monde diplomatique (édition norvégienne)


De plus en plus les gens aux USA sont convaincus que les autorités usaméricaines dissimulent leur participation à la tragédie du 9/11. Les déclarations des témoins, estampillées confidentielles pendant plusieurs années, prouvent maintenant que la démolition contrôlée a peut-être eu lieu. Le gouvernement US avait de longue date prévu un tel incident -- comme l’indique le document de défenses républicain Reconstruction de l’Amérique de 2000. L'organisation 9/11Truth croit que les USA ont probablement orchestré un incident de ce genre pour justifier l'invasion de l'Irak et de l'Afghanistan, comme pour restreindre des libertés civiquees US par l'introduction du Patriot Act. Il apparaît maintenant qu’en 1962 le chef militaire le plus haut d'Amérique conçut un plan d’attaque préméditée sur les Usaméricains, qui impliquait d’abattre un avion de ligne, de sorte que la responsabilité puisse être portée sur Cuba. Alors pourquoi cela devrait-il être exclu aujourd'hui ? Beaucoup croient aussi que les renseignements pakistanais ont coopéré avec la CIA et Al Qaïda parce qu'ils ont transféré d’importantes sommes d'argent au pirate de l'air Mohamed Atta dans les jours débouchant sur le 9/11. Ils ont même eu Ben Laden sous surveillance durant la durée de ses soins dans un hôpital militaire de Peshawar au Pakistan, en septembre 2001.

La plupart d'entre nous auraient trouvé étrange que l'impact d'un avion de ligne soit insuffisant pour faire s’effondrer un gratte-ciel. Donc, peu doutèrent de ce qui frappa les tours jumelles le 11 septembre 2001, ou de l’identité des malfaiteurs. Cependant, les années passant, plusieurs personnes et groupes, en Amérique du Nord et en Europe, commencèrent à douter que cela soit forcément exact. Pour eux, un ensemble de circonstances contradictoires entourant les attaques ne correspondent pas aux explications des autorités américaines et de la Commission sur le 11 septembre nommée par le Congrès. [1]

L’une des raisons principales de ce doute est qu'il y a des témoins du 11/9 qui décrivent des événements ne correspondant pas à ceux de l'histoire officielle. [2] Un exemple est donné par les spectateurs qui ont entendu et vu ce qu'ils pensaient être des explosions autour des tours jumelles avant que les avions les heurtent. Des policiers pensèrent qu'elles ressemblaient " à des implosions planifiées ". [3] Le pompier Richard Banaciski déclara ceci : " Cela ressemblait à ce qu’on voit à la télévision quand ils font sauter ces bâtiments. Cela semblait provenir de tout autour comme une ceinture, toutes ces explosions. " Stephen Gregory, le Commissaire Assistant au Feu déclara : " J'ai vu un flash flash flash au niveau le plus bas du bâtiment. Vous savez, comme quand ils démolissent un bâtiment ". [4]

Un autre témoignage controversé est venu de William Rodriguez, l'ouvrier d'entretien qui travaillait dans la tour nord le 11/9. Dans une interview au New York Magazine, [5] il déclara avoir entendu en premier une énorme explosion alors qu’il était au second sous-sol du gratte-ciel et témoigna de l'aspect des victimes, la peau brûlée de leurs bras par le feu dans la cage d'ascenseur. Après l'explosion au second sous-sol il en entendit une autre au dessus. C'était le Boeing 767. William fut le dernier rescapé survivant au Ground Zero du WTC. Il fut salué comme héros et invité à visiter George Bush et la Maison Blanche. Plus tard, lorsqu’il tenta de donner de la publicité à son histoire d'explosion au second sous-sol, il fut rejeté par les autorités usaméricaines. Il a maintenant entamé une poursuite judiciaire contre ces mêmes autorités sous le Statut RICO, une action judiciaire conçue à l'origine pour poursuivre les familles de la Mafia.

A côté des rapports de témoins décrivant une démolition contrôlée des tours jumelles avec des explosifs, des critiques de l'administration Bush croient il y a plusieurs ensembles de circonstances entourant le 11/9 qui donnent de bonnes raisons de suspecter la véracité de l'histoire officielle.

C'est un fait qu'aucun des quatre avions détournés ne fut arrêté par les avions de combat. Cela combiné au fait que la majorité de l'Armée de l'Air était engagée dans des exercices militaires, donna poids au soupçon que la force de défense aérienne usaméricaine avait donné l'ordre de " se retirer " de sorte que les attaques terroristes puissent se dérouler sans encombre. Une autre événement suspect est que le WTC 7 -- aussi connu sous le nom de Bâtiment 7 -- un gratte-ciel de 47 étages, s’effondra sans avoir été heurté par les avions. Réciproquement, les bâtiments adjacents sont toujours intacts.


Complete 911 Timeline

Categories


Before 9/11


Soviet-Afghan War (15)Warning Signs (265)Insider Trading (39)Counterterrorism Before 9/11 (238)Military Exercises (49)Hunt for bin Laden (86)Pipeline Politics (57)


Day of 9/11


All Day of 9/11 Events (435)Flight AA 11 (62)Flight UA 175 (48)Flight AA 77 (74)Flight UA 93 (109)George Bush (69)Dick Cheney (24)Donald Rumsfeld (26)Richard Clarke (22)


Financing of Al-Qaeda: A More Detailed Look


Al Taqwa Bank (19)BMI and Ptech (19)


Geopolitics and 9/11


Pakistani ISI (142)Saudi Arabia (127)Bin Laden Family (44)Al Qaeda Financing (141)Israel (36)Iraq (49)US Dominance (50)


Investigations: A Detailed Look


9/11 Congressional Inquiry (24)9/11 Commission (47)WTC Investigation (53)


Other Al-Qaeda Operatives


Al-Qaeda in Germany (56)Mamoun Darkazanli (17)Osama bin Laden (26)Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (35)Zacarias Moussaoui (49)Nabil al-Marabh (33)Ali Mohamed (51)


Projects and Programs


Phoenix Memo (19)Able Danger (41)Randy Glass (7)Robert Wright and Vulgar Betrayal (64)Sibel Edmonds (8)Remote Surveillance (30)


The Alleged 9/11 Hijackers


Alhazmi and Almihdhar (83)Marwan Alshehhi (44)Mohamed Atta (85)Ziad Jarrah (11)Hani Hanjour (33)Other 9/11 Hijackers (60)


The ISI: A More Detailed Look


Saeed Sheikh (40)Mahmood Ahmed (15)Drugs (26)


The Post-9/11 World


Denials (21)Afghanistan (84)Escape From Afghanistan (37)Investigations (247)War on Terrorism (46)Civil Liberties (46)Media (33)Other events (59)


Warning Signs: Specific Cases


1993 WTC bombing (8)1998 US Embassy Bombings (0)2000 USS Cole Bombing (1)Bojinka (19)Foreign Intelligence Warnings (29)


Period


1979-Dec. 2000 2001-9/11 The day of 9/11 9/11-Dec.2001 2002-Present


Articles


Alhazmi and Almihdhar: The 9/11 Hijackers Who Should Have Been Caught An Interesting Day: President Bush's Movements and Actions on 9/11 Is There More to the Capture of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed Than Meets the Eye? Katrina Timeline - First installment Sept. 11's Smoking Gun: The Many Faces of Saeed Sheikh The Failure to Defend the Skies on 9/11 The Two Ziad Jarrahs


Videos


Interview with Paul Thompson on Fox News Affilliate Randy Glass Video


Miscellanous Pages


Correction to timeline entries containing erroneous information about Khalid bin Mahfouz Correction to timeline entries containing erroneous information about Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi Help Needed Links Tracking the Terror


False Flag Operations: Declassified Military Documents Show How US Government Planned Terrorist Attacks Against its Own Citizens


New York, NY (PRWEB) September 7th, 2006 – As reported by ABC News, stunning military documents codenamed "Operation Northwoods" were declassified in recent years and show how in 1962, the top US military leaders planned an operation to create terror attacks against its own cities and kill US citizens. See: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1


False Flag Operations: Declassified Military Documents Show How US Government Planned Terrorist Attacks Against its Own Citizens


New York, NY (PRWEB) September 7th, 2006 – As reported by ABC News, stunning military documents codenamed "Operation Northwoods" were declassified in recent years and show how in 1962, the top US military leaders planned an operation to create terror attacks against its own cities and kill US citizens. See: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1


The documents state that through the fabrication of false evidence, the US would blame Cuba and gain public support for an unpopular war against Castro. They included developing a fake Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, the use of airplanes, and much more.


For further details, the now declassified military documents are available at the National Security Archive of the George Washington University: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/


In his newly published book "Towers of Deception – The Media Cover-Up of 9/11," Barrie Zwicker, writes about Operation Northwoods and many other such operations that the military and intelligence community refer to as "false flag operations." http://www.newsociety.com/bookid/3932


VIDEO: 911 MYSTERIES


A carefully research documentary which challenges the official version

Reports of bombs in the buildings. Explosions

click here


Le 11 septembre à la loupe


Washington Post Doesn't Answer Why No Bin Laden 9/11 Indictment


A Washington Post article today attempts to refute and dismiss questions as to why the FBI's most wanted page for Osama bin Laden includes no apportion of blame for 9/11 - yet the Post fails to answer why there has been no formal indictment of bin Laden five years after 9/11 when it only took three months to charge him with the 1998 embassy bombings.


FLASHBACK: FOX News confirms Osama died in 2001


Top Bin Laden Expert: Confession Fake


Is the famous “confession video” genuine? Despite Bush’s insistence that the tape is authentic, America’s top academic Bin Laden expert has finally gone on the record, joining numerous other experts.


Including this one - M. R.


BELLACIAO - SUPER HOT BREAKING INTEL: Bushfraud Diversion


The real story is that Musharraf, Pakistani President, knows that Bin Laden is dead and knows where he is buried. And knows that the bogeyman has gone to his maker aka kidney failure, Jan. 2002.


Explosions on 911

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I





More 911 Explosions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM







WTC witnesses to explosions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uOFXsfskM






Fireman: Bomb In The Building


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W53wdu8IGlE


9/11 Truth: Thermite & The Case for Controlled Demolition


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vd1-Dp_-7WI


9/11 Truth: Scott Forbes describes power-downs in WTC



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEJmcvTzYfo


Molten Metal found at the WTC months after 9/11



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ


Bush saw first plane hit the WTC on 9/11


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F6kouXg40Q


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_cC37d5kOs


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0YqvgR9Whw


NYPD Officer Heard Building 7 Bombs


"The whole time you're hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it"


Everyone's First Reaction Was "Controlled Demolition"


WRH: Evidence of Demolition Charges In WTC 2


"As we were moving toward the building we saw the top begin to blow out in a plume of smoke and we heard the noise associated with an implosion."

Video Evidence of an Explosion at the Base of WTC 1


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shake.html


"We've heard of secondary explosions after the aircraft impacted - whether in fact there wasn't something else at the base of the towers that in fact were the coup de grace to bring them to the ground."


WMV video download (276kB)


WMV video download (120kB)


Banned From The Classroom: 911 Physics Scientist Who Proved Thermite Involved In WTC Demolitions


September 11th Revisited: Were explosives used?


More Ground Zero Heroes On The Record: Building 7 Was Deliberately Brought Down


More Ground Zero Heroes On The Record: Building 7 Was Deliberately Brought Down
Testimony of multiple rescue personnel that they were told Building 7 was going to be imploded means FEMA, NIST, Silverstein Properties and federal government all lied, revelations demand immediate grand jury inquiry into insurance fraud, vindicates call for new independent 9/11 investigation


NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


Two unexplained “spikes” in the seismic record from Sept. 11 indicate huge bursts of energy shook the ground beneath the World Trade Center’s twin towers immediately prior to the collapse.


Criminal Offense: Removal Of Forensic Evidence on 9/11


You have to wonder. Why didn’t NYC investigate the forensics of 9/11? Why didn’t Rudy Giuliani forbid the removal of materials from Ground Zero and do his own investigation? Why? Because he couldn’t. The WTC was under the jurisdiction of the Port Authority.


The Port Authority is a governmental body appointed by the Govenor of NY, Govenor Pataki, and Govenor of NJ, Govenor Whitman. This means that the Federal Government removed critical forensic evidence from WTC with the blessing of both Pataki and Whitman.


The 9/11 Chronicles: Destroying a Crime Scene


Bush Tacitly Implies WTC Controlled Demolition?


Click here for the audio.


Official Transcript: President Bush admits bombs were in World Trade Towers.


"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping. "


CLICK HERE FOR BUSH MAKING THIS STATEMENT


There you have it. President Bush had admitted what the eyewitnesses reported on 9-11; that there were bombs inside the World Trade Towers.


Of course, Bush pins the blame for the bombs on Al Qaeda, which is sort of accurate when you consider that most of Al Qaeda is a creation of US and Israeli intelligence.


But in trying to explain away the eyewitness reports of bombs, Bush has dug himself into a deeper logic hole. How did these "Al Qaeda" bombers manage to spend at least a week (according to witnesses who heard and saw them) working inside the buildings under the noses of Bush's cousin and brother, who were in charge of security for the World Trade Center? Security at the towers was tight following the 1993 attempted bombing. You could not simply walk into an elevator unless you could document employment or a meeting. Yet as one can tell from the tell-tale marks left by the cutter charges, these preparations took a great deal of time and materials to carry out.


Why did these "Al Qaeda" bombers go to the extra effort to drop all three buildings straight down instead of toppling them sideways, maximizing the damage?


If Al Qaeda succeeded in bombing the buildings, why bother with the airplanes? Why bother hiding the bombing itself, if it was truly the work of terrorists out to make a statement?


In admitting the bombs, Bush has opened up the inquiry to include the very great amount of incriminating evidence found near the airplanes linking the attacks to Arab nations, versus the total absence of any such evidence near the bombs. This contrast is ONLY explained if the evidence left with the airplanes was planted, to frame someone.


Why did it take 5 years for the government to admit what was obvious to everyone right from the start; that explosives were used to bring down the buildings, unless the original plan was not to admit to the bombs in the first place?


Dubya, in his pathetic attempt to pin the blame for the now-admitted bombs on Al Qaeda, has created far more logical problems then he has solved.


SUPPRESSED DETAILS OF CRIMINAL INSIDER TRADING LEAD DIRECTLY INTO THE CIA'S HIGHEST RANKS


CIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "BUZZY" KRONGARD
MANAGED FIRM THAT HANDLED "PUT" OPTIONS ON UAL


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/illegaltrades.html


Larry “Lucky Larry” Silverstein


What do the Statue of Liberty and WTC Towers have in common?


In 1989 - there were plans to erect scaffolding and disassemble the WTC towers and rebuild them. Cost projection was around $5.6 billion. One of the architects shows up to work one day and the MIB's were there - had confiscated all of the plans, specs, details, etc for WTC. They even confiscated their office cubicles and had tape on the floor outlining where they went.


Reason - the exterior cast aluminum WTC panels had been directly connected to the steel superstructure of the building, thus causing galvanic corrosion. In short, the "life cycle" of the WTC was not 200 - 300 years, more like 30 years or so.


What an amazing coincidence that the "terrorists" attacked a building which was going to have to be demolished anyway!


Judge Finds NYC and Silverstein Must Answer To Sending Workers Into Toxic Environments


9-11 Research: Flight 93 Crash Site


9/11 in Perspective – Flight 93 & WTC7


International airline to allow cell phone chatter on planes


But while some upscale, long-haul airlines are installing equipment onboard that will allow for cell phone use, it may be a while before the service makes its way to the U.S.


Oh really? We were told cell phones worked just fine on airliners on 9-11!


Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job


Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77

911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8


Flight 93 'was shot down' claims book


DC Envoy Says Bush Ordered Flight 93 Shot Down


Doubletree video release to 'shock & awe' before election?


FLASHBACK: THE US GOVERNMENT INFORMED OTHER NATIONS OF ITS PLAN TO INVADE AFGHANISTAN MONTHS BEFORE THE 9/11 ATTACKS


Discover the Secret Right-Wing Network Behind ABC's 9/11 Deception


"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." -- William Colby, former CIA director


Pourquoi se sont certainement effondrés les bâtiments du WTC ?

par Steven E. Jones


Département de Physique et d'Astronomie Brigham Young University (BYH)


Dans ce document, j'appelle à une enquête sérieuse sur l'hypothèse que le WTC 7 et les Tours Jumelles ont été abattus, non pas simplement à cause des dommages des impacts et des feux, mais par l'utilisation de charges de découpe placées à l'avance. Je considère les rapports officiels de la FEMA, du NIST, et de la Commission du 9-11, selon lesquels les feux plus les dommages des impacts ont seuls causé l'effondrement complet des trois bâtiments. Et je présente la preuve d'une hypothèse de démolition contrôlée, qui est suggérée par les données disponibles, qui peuvent être testées scientifiquement, et qui n'ont été analysées dans aucun des rapports financés par le gouvernement US.


Lifting the Fog on 9/11: Experts Present Scientific Evidence at UC Berkeley


An all day symposium, titled "Lifting the Fog", took place Saturday at the Valley Life Science Building at UC Berkeley. To an auditorium full of attentive listeners, a number of experts (most notably Dr. Steven Jones, a renowned physicist) gathered to present their findings about the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001.


Symposium examines the 9/11 World Trade Center disaster with focus on using the Scientific Method


The panelists described how they used the Scientific Method (investigation involving observation and theory to systematically test scientific hypotheses) to reach conclusions that the official government explanations about the 9/11 Disaster were outrageously flawed.


Rather than focus on laying blame on the government, however, the panelists largely argued that the public unite to demand wider investigation of the 9/11 disaster. They also expressed the hope that their own findings would be published and be examined-- to stand or fall on their own merit.


It is hoped that this presentation will soon be made available for broadcast. On the internet, look for it in the future at KPFA

http://www.gunsandbutter.net/index.php or TUC Radio http://www.tucradio.org/

Here are some other useful links to learn more about the event, its panelists and their discoveries:

Lifting the Fog
The Scientific Method Applaied to the World Trade Center Disaster
http://liftingthefog.org/press.html

Steven Jones, PhD
http://www.journalof911studies.com
Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Collapse? [PDF]
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf

Jim Hoffman, M.F.A.
9-11 Research
http://911research.wtc7.net/

Mickey S. Huff, M.A.
RetroPoll.org
http://retropoll.org/

Janette MacKinlay
Fortunate, a Personal Diary of 9/11
http://www.theneedtoremember.com/gallery_books.html

Nate Mudd, J.D.
SimmonsCooper, LLC (The office of the attorney who specializes in asbestos litigation for victims' compensation and rights)
http://www.simmonscooper.com/

Jenna Orkin, M.A., J.D.
World Trade Center Environmental Organization
http://wtceo.org/

Peter Phillips, Ph.D.
Project Censored
http://www.projectcensored.org/

Paul W. Rea, Ph.D.
Still Seeking the Truth about 9/11
http://www.peaceproject.com/books/BK22.htm


SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH ASSAILED


Kentucky Teacher Placed In Psych Ward For Declaring 9/11 Was An 'Inside Job'


This was a favorite tactic of the old Soviet Union; declare those who thought "dangerous" thoughts to be crazy and lock therm away.


An explosion of disbelief - fresh doubts over 9/11

Category: 911


I am concerned that the focus is on "Loose Change", a film which still perpetuates the "No Plane at the Pentagon" hoax.


Nonconspiracy theorist David Ray Griffin takes aim at the official 9-11 story


Seekin' that Ol' 911 Truth

James Patton


First two simple questions:


Q1: On September 11 2001, how many buildings collapsed in New York City?


A: Two? No, THREE. The Twin Towers were hit by aeroplanes, but WTC 7, a massive 47 storey steel-framed skyscraper also collapsed. It was NOT hit by a plane. The evidence is clear - this was a controlled demolition. http://wtc7.net/ http://911physics.co.nr/ (Click on WTC 7 link)


Q2: How long did it take the FBI to bring charges against Usama bin Laden in connection with 911? One hour, eight hours, a day, a week?


A: Usama bin Laden is NOT on the FBI most wanted list in connection with 911. Why not? According to FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4673 http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm (accessed 20 August 2006)


If you believe 911 was an inside job, YOU ARE NOT ALONE. Below are just a small selection amongst the millions of credible persons including engineers, scientists, intelligence analysts, actors, theologians, philosophers, authors, investigative journalists, lawyers, military personel, politicians, family members and eye-witnesses who believe the investigation into the events of September 11 2001 must urgently be reopened.


What's Wrong With America


What the World Trade Center Building Designers Said: Before and After 9/11


New Bond Film Highlights 9/11 Insider Trading


Fails to mention it led straight back to the CIA, was not investigated by 9/11 Commission


Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
Hollywood director Russo recalls remarkable "forecast" of coming attack


Aucun commentaire: