Émission de radio L'Autre Monde

Pour écouter, cliquez sur l'image! ..............................................
Suivez aussi L'Autre Monde sur YouTube et sur Twitter

dimanche 19 mars 2006

Iraq et Iran vs the Global Empire















Iraq et Iran vs the Global Empire


IRAQ


Revealed: the brutality of the US reign of terror in Iraq

La brutalite du reigne de la terreur americaine en Iraq vient d'etre expose encore une fois dans de nouveaux documents declassifies. L'utilisation systematique de la torture par des unites militaires US font partie d'un programme qui est directement finance par le US Congress!!!

Abu Ghraib was no one-off. Simon Assaf reports on the documents that reveal systematic torture by secret US military units in Iraq and elsewhere – and the attempts to cover it up
Newly declassified documents have exposed widespread and systematic torture in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay by a shadowy US military unit operating as part of a “Special Access Programme”. This secret unit is funded directly by the US Congress.


Secret plan to take over Iraq Oil

Greg Palast, jouraliste a utilise le "Freedom of Information Act", loi permettant aux americains d'acceder a des informations et documents gouvernementaux tenu comme "secrets", et a expose un plan par les compagnies petrolieres, le gouvernement US et britannique de forcer un coup d'etat en Iraq.

L'administration Bush avait fait des plans de guerre et de conquete du petrole iraquien avant meme les attaques du 11 septembre 2001. La seule chose qui leur manquait etait un evenement catalyseur pour justifier leurs guerres de conquetes et de vol de ressources et de territoires. WTC 9-11 vient s'inserer ici comme evenement catalyseur.


Using the Freedom of Information Act, a joint request from Palast, Newsnight and Harper's magazine exposed a plan by oil companies, our government, and Britain, to force a coup d'etate in Iraq. Apparently, this was to take control of Iraq's oil fields, so that OPEC would have competition in the region. Most disturbing is that this planning took place even before September 11, 2001!

The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed. Two years ago today - when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad - protesters claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq's oil once Saddam had been conquered.


US illegality in Iraq: Where is the limit?

Article qui questionne ou se trouve la limite des crimes et de l'illegalite de l'occupation US de l'Iraq.


The United States-led occupation continues to demolish humanitarian law with impunity in Iraq.

Occupying powers have bred a culture of insecurity that destroys the lives of ordinary Iraqis.

Three years have passed since the United States launched an illegal war of aggression on the sovereign Republic of Iraq. Neither were weapons of mass destruction found nor democracy or human rights advanced. Within one month, Iraqis will enter their fourth year as a people under occupation, ruled by a puppet regime that sanctions death squads and torture.
The time has long passed for this to end.


Saddam Silenced For Fingering US In Iraq Bombings

Comme dans le proces bidon du maintenant defunt Milosevic, le proces de Saddam Hussein est de la pure bullshit. C'est organise de A a Z. Le gros probleme des americains dans ces deux proces, c'est que Hussein et Milosevic sont dans la mesure de decrire avec precision et documenter les crimes de guerre et contre l'humanite que Washington a commis, bien plus grave que ceux qu'ils pretendent juger.

Lorsque ces deux hommes se mettent a parler de sujets tres compromettant pour l'Empire US, les micros sont eteints, on refuse qu'ils parlent, et la censure mediatique s'en suit.

Lorsque Saddam commentait recemment durant son proces que la guerre civile en Iraq est deliberement encouragee par les US, ils ont ferme les micros et ont donne l'ordre aux medias de ne pas rapporter ses commentaires!!!


After the murder of Slobo Milosevic prevented the true Butchers of Serbia, Wes Clark and Bill Clinton, from being brought to justice, on the very first day of Saddam Hussein's testimony the judge turned off his microphone and ordered all media to leave following Saddam's comments that the civil war in Iraq is being deliberately fueled by the US.

Over the

past few weeks we have highlighted Israeli and US foreign policy documents that actually encourage not deter the break out of civil war in Iraq. Decades old blueprints document how inter-Arab conflict would be beneficial to the Neo-Cons, initiating ethnic cleansing in Iraq and drawing in Iran and Syria to provide a pretext to expand the war.

Several highly suspicious events over the past year, such as the
Samarra Mosque bombing and the staged SAS attack on Iraqi police, have brought this eventuality closer.
High profile trials like those of Milosevic and Hussein often backfire because top level criminality on the part of the US government and its international henchmen NATO and the UN is always exposed by the defendant.

The Hague were losing the case against Milosevic because he provided documented evidence of
US government support of Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden in the late 1990's and was about to call Bill Clinton as a witness.

Similarly, Saddam's defense consists of he fact that the chemical and biological weapons allegedly used to poison residents of Halabja in March 1988 were
sold to him by the US government and specifically Donald Rumsfeld.

Today, Hussein fingered the hidden hand behind the staged bombings in Iraq and his microphone was immediately shut off by the judge. From the
AP.

"As Saddam continued reading from a prepared text, the judge repeatedly closed his microphone to prevent his words from being heard and told him to address the charges against him. Saddam ignored the judge and continued speaking."

Saddam Was Trying to Capture Zarqawi:

Un autre mensonge clairement identifie: Saddam n'avait pas de liens avec l'Al Qaida et Zarqawi entre autre, puisque selon des documents du gouvernement iraquien recemment relaches rapportent que Hussein voulait capturer Zarqawi!


"The Country Has Already Collapsed"

Les USA ont completement ravage l'Iraq, et il est entendu que le pays s'est effondre completement. Democratie made in USA.


One Thousand A Month Tortured To Death In Iraq

Selon les chiffres de la morgue de Baghdad, ils recoivent environ 1000 corps de gens qui portent des signes evident de torture ou d'execution sommaire. Entre 80 et 90% etaient innocents....

"The Baghdad morgue received 1,100 bodies in July alone, about 900 of whom bore evidence of torture or summary execution. That continued throughout the year and last December there were 780 bodies, including 400 having gunshot wounds or wounds as those caused by electric drills."
Pace echoed previous estimates in stating that 80 to 90 per cent of those rounded up and taken to prison camps were completely innocent. As we have highlighted before, Iraqis are arrested for dastardly crimes such as
not showing their papers at checkpoints, selling alcohol and shouting anti-coalition statements.


Academics become casualties of Iraq War

C'est vraiment impossible a manquer a quel point la situation est grave et horrifiante. Depuis l'invasion US, des tueurs ont abattu quelques 182 professeurs d'universite iraquiens, en plus de 85 autres qui ont echappe a la mort. Les professeurs sont cible volontairement, ce qui entraine un exile de ces gens rendant l'education en Iraq tres precaire.


BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Gunmen have killed some 182 Iraqi university professors and academics since the U.S. invasion in early 2003 and a group representing Iraqi academia said on Thursday the killings constituted a war crime.
Another 85 senior academics have been kidnapped or survived assassination attempts, according to the Association of University Lecturers in Iraq.
The attacks have led to an exodus of Iraqi academics who are vital to educating and rebuilding the war-damaged country. "What is going on in Iraq against these professors is a real war crime,"


Let’s indeed talk about Iraq Losing its innocents

5 Children Shot In Head as US raid on home killed 11 family members


Killing Children: The “My Lai phase” of the Iraq war

Qui paie le prix le plus eleve dans ces stupides guerres? Les enfants bien sur, qui en sortent ampute, traumatise et detruit a vie bien souvent. Sans parler de l'uranium appauvri qui les tue a petit feu.

5 enfants et le reste d'une famille, pour un total de 11 membres d'une famille sont trouve mort apres un raid de l'armee US sur une maison. Les 5 enfants sont morts d'une balle dans la tete, gracieusete de l'armee US. Ca me donne l'envie de vomir..

Prenez le temps de voir les photos du 3e article, trop rares, sortant de l'Iraq sur la realite de la-bas. On en est rendu au point ou les enfants sont la cible des soldats, enfants retrouve avec balles dans la tete. Completement revoltant, debile, tellement criminel et mal.


Former CIA Analyst: Western Intelligence May Be Behind Mosque Bombing

Kuwait offers 10 million dollars for Iraq

50 security firm workers kidnapped in Iraq

Iraq parliament ends in deadlock


Ca fait trois mois que les elections sont terminees, et le gouvernement n'a toujours pas encore ete forme. Ce gouvernement et ces elections sont une grosse farce americaine qui tourne mal encore une fois.
L'Iraq est en chaos. C'est le bordel le plus total, et l'armee US n'a aucun espece de controle. Ils ont deja perdu la guerre, et plus rien ne fonctionne dans le pays.



IRAN


World War III or Bust: Implications of a US Attack on Iran

Il est tres ironique que les USA veulent utiliser des armes nucleaires contre l'Iran pour proteger le monde d'armes... nucleaire.... De plus, ceux qui poussent pour une attaque militaire sur l'Iran, Israel et les USA, ne se plient pas aux exigences du Traite de Non-Proliferation et refusent toutes inspections alors que l'Iran est en regle a tous les niveaux...

How ironic that the Pentagon proposes using nuclear weapons on the pretext of protecting the world from nuclear weapons. Ironic also that Iran has complied with its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, allowing inspectors to “go anywhere and see anything,” yet those pushing for an attack, the USA and Israel, have not.


America and Iran: At the Brink of the Abyss

Whether
the U.S. will use nuclear weapons against Iran if a military confrontation erupts is in the hands of a single person, President Bush, as stated in NSC 30 from 1948: " the decision as to the employment of atomic weapons in the event of war is to be made by the Chief Executive when he considers such decision to be required." Bush will certainly not ask Congress nor the public permission once hostilities start. Whether or not tactical nuclear weapons should be deployed and used against Iran is a matter that needs to be faced by America right now !


Iran: Logic out the window at the White House

The biggest pitfall in predicting the behavior of radical groups like the inner circle of the Bush administration is that you keep telling yourself that they would never actually do whatever it is they’re talking about. Surely they must realize that acting like that would cause a disaster. Then they go right ahead and do it.


Israel will have to act on Iran if UN can'

Iran will be stopped, Cheney vows to Israeli lobbyists

On comprend clairement qui sont au travail pour aggresser l'Iran, que c'est Israel qui est vraiment derriere tout cette affaire incroyable. Cheney porte allegeance a Israel et promet toute servitude a son maitre.



Britain breaks with the US over Iran

Grosse nouvelle par contre: Blair a officiellement declare qu'il ne participerait pas a l'attaque. Il est sous une pression incroyable du peuple et serait jete dehors au premier mouvement vers une nouvelle guerre criminelle.

DUBAI: Britain has told the United States that it will not take part in any armed action against Iran’s nuclear sites, according to diplomatic sources in London. Already facing huge public criticism for his participation in the Iraq war, Prime Minister Tony Blair is seeking to distance himself from America’s belligerent rhetoric towards Iran.
Blair knows he would probably not survive the political storm if Britain joined in an attack on Iran. The concern in Whitehall, however, is that the Bush administration, egged on by Israel and its powerful friends in the United States, risks developing an unstoppable momentum towards war a war in which Britain clearly wants no part.



The Tehran Oil Bourse: What the Iran 'nuclear issue' is really about

Launch of Iranian oil trading hits wall:
No, the Iran Oil Bourse is not a casus belli…

Articles apportant un autre point de vue supportant que la Bourse Iranienne de petrole en Euro$ n'est pas le motif des USA d'attaquer, mais qu'il s'agit plutot de consideration petroliere et geostrategique.

Il est vrai que les plans d'attaquer l'Iran remonte a avant meme le WTC 9-11 et longtemps avant que le projet de la bourse soit meme discute en Iran. Je pense que le fait que l'Iran voulait faire ca aurait pu endommager le US$ serieusement et aurait ete une raison supplementaire d'accelerer les plans de l'attaque. Mais la on va vraiment voir car la bourse n'ouvrira pas avant un an encore a cause de problemes.


A number of writings have recently appeared with the thesis that the announced plans of the Teheran government to institute a Teheran Oil Bourse, perhaps as early as this month, is the real hidden reason behind the evident march to war on Iran from the Anglo-American powers. The thesis is in our opinion mistaken for many reasons, not the least, that war on Iran has been in planning since the 1990’s, as an integral part of the US Greater Middle East strategy.
More significantly, the Oil Bourse argument is a Red Herring that diverts attention from the real geopolitical grounds behind the march towards war which have been detailed on this website, including my piece, ‘Calculating the Risk of War in Iran’ which was posted on

GlobalResearch.ca on January 29, 2006

In 1996, Richard Perle and Douglas Feith, two neo-conservatives later to play an important role in formulation of Bush Administration Pentagon policy in the Middle East, authored a paper for then-newly-elected Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. That advisory paper, ‘A Clean Break: a New Strategy for Securing the Realm,’ called on Netanyahu to make a ‘clean break from the peace process.’ They also called on Netanyahu to strengthen Israel’s defenses to better confront Syria and Iraq, and to go after Iran as the prop of Syria.


Un « choc et stupeur » en préparation pour l’Iran

Le lancement d’une guerre directe contre l’Iran est maintenant rendu aux « préparatifs finaux ». Selon des documents du Pentagone, les attaques aériennes impliqueraient l’utilisation d’armes nucléaires tactiques ou « mini-nuques ». Les partenaires de la coalition incluant les États-Unis, Israël et la Turquie, sont maintenant dans « un état de préparation avancée ».


IAEA says no evidence of Iranian n-weapons plan

Que ceci soit bien clair: tout la propagande autour des supposees intentions de l'Iran de developper une bombe nucleaire est une fabrication mensongere destinee a justifier sa destruction. L'Agence de l'Energie Atomique Internationale rapporte qu'il n'y a aucun signe que l'iran a de telles intentions. AUCUNES PREUVES.


DUBAI: As the countdown for a crucial meeting on Iran on March 6 gets under way, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has revealed that it has not found any evidence that Teheran had diverted material towards making atomic weapons. In its report which has been circulated to its 35 board members, the IAEA said that its three years of investigations had not shown "any diversion of nuclear material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices", the Associated Press reported


Iran was not referred to the Security Council for Noncompliance

Mefiez vous des mass medias sur la question de l'Iran. La desinformation fait rage. Les faits sont partout, c'est indiscutable. Les mass medias nous mentent en pleine face.


How powerful is the corporate information-system we call the mainstream media? Is it powerful enough, for example, to mislead the public into believing that Iran has been “referred” to the United Nations Security Council for violations to the NPT, thus paving the way for another war on the back of false information? The IAEA DID NOT report on Iran’s “noncompliance” to the Security Council, because there is no evidence that Iran has done anything wrong.

In fact, as nuclear physicist
Gordon Prather points out in his recent article, “March Madness, “THE BOARD DIDN’T REPORT ANYTHING.” Then why does the media keep insisting that Iran is being called before the Security Council for noncompliance? Could it be that the media is simply executing an agenda that is deliberately designed to deceive? There was no “referral” and there will be no “punitive action” because there are no violations. “Rather”, as Prather ads, “the IAEA Board ‘REQUESTED’ that Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei report to the Security Council”…”calling on Iran to-among other things-implement ‘transparency measures’”.

These “transparency measures” have nothing to do with Iran’s obligations under the NPT. They are additional demands made at the behest of the Bush administration (through strong-arm tactics with nations on the IAEA Board) that will force Iran to provide access to “individuals, documentation relating to procurement, dual-use equipment, certain military owned workshops, and research and development as the Agency may request in support of its ongoing investigations”.


Nuke deal to enable India to make 50 weapons a year

Mais les doubles standards ne semble pas les gener beaucoup. Alors que les USA joue au policier scandalise a propos du suppose programme nucleaire iranien, les USA vont aider l'Inde a produire plus de 50 tetes nucleaires (des vraies cette fois-ci) par annee. Completement ridicule et dangeureux.

Iran warns US will also suffer 'harm and pain'

L'Iran ne se laisse pas intimider par les menaces americaines et a la suite d'un commentaire US disant que l'Iran pourrait souffrir de ses decisions, on repondu que les USA vont aussi souffrir s'ils attaquent.

Iran vowed Wednesday that the United States would also suffer as a result of the U.S.-led move to have Tehran sanctioned by the UN Security Council over its disputed nuclear program.
"The United States has the power to cause harm and pain," Iran said a statement meant for delivery at the
International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-country board meeting in Vienna.
"But the United States is also susceptible to harm and pain. So if that is the path that the U.S. wishes to choose, let the ball roll."


Iran official says U.S. behind al-Qaeda attacks

Ce n'est pas une grosse nouvelle pour qui est informe, mais oui, les USA sont bel et bien derriere l'Al Qaida et orchestrent des fausses attaques terroristes sous le couvert d'organisations terroristes qu'ils supportent. C'est pas beau la vie?


Tehran, Iran, Mar. 04 – Iran’s Interior Minister accused the United States of using its infiltrators in al-Qaeda to carry out terrorist attacks that would serve its interests, government-owned newspapers in Tehran reported on Saturday.


Iran : « Le président Bush fait un beau cadeau à Ahmadi Nejad ».


W.House cautious on Iran-Russia deal

Ahmadinejad: Israel 'will be removed'

Tehran (dpa) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Saturday that the Palestinians and "other nations" will eventually remove Israel from the region.


Dubai and the Straits of Hormuz :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - ch


Iran’s conference on Holocaust denial begins on Tuesday

Anti-Zionist Orthodox Rabbis visited iran

Iran Proposal for Shoah Probe Rebuffed by Europeans

Le seul evenement historique qui n'est pas legal d'investiguer, une curiosite qui font naitre de serieuse questions comme: Qu'ont t-ils a cacher??????

Pourquoi ont-ils si peur qu'on investigue serieusement et methodiquement l'Holocauste des Juifs?????

Ils enferment des gens en prison juste pour avoir eu l'insolence de poser des questions a ce sujet.

La verite est la verite et n'a pas besoin de cours de justice pour se faire imposer, elle s'impose d'elle-meme. Ceux qui s'y opposeront seront couvert de ridicule. Mais des mensonges doivent etre supporte par des lois.


With an international showdown fast approaching, Iran once again upset Jewish organizations and raised Western ire by questioning the Holocaust. This time, Iran proposed sending a team of investigators to conduct on-site inspections of Nazi concentration camps, in advance of a Tehran-sponsored conference to debate the "real scale of the Holocaust."

Posted

Feb 26, 2006 06:57 AM

"What? Actually look at the facts and evidence? Are you out of your #$%#^# MIND!!!!"
(Ahem)

Obviously, my stance on freedom of speech and freedom of inquiry has provoked the usual deluge of emails (mostly obscene and anonymous) screaming that I must be an anti-Semite Jew hating bastard to think that anyone questioning the orthodox account of the holocaust should not be thrown into jail as a means to silence them.

My goal is truth. and if there is one lesson to be learned from the current Iraq war it is that governments do lie to their people to manufacture consent to various agendas. Therefore prudence demands that the citizen ALWAYS question what they have been taught in school.
One thing is clear. It is the very actions of those defending the orthodox view of WW2 that most suggest there have been other lies on a scale equal to that which launched the war on Iraq.

There are people who claim the Apollo Moon landings are fake. Such people are treated as nutcases who refuse to look at the facts (or government plants out to make trouble for serious investigators). Those who are really interested in examining the issue are free to do so, and a simple science experiment with a laser and telescope easily confirms that the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflectors (part of the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package) are exactly where they are supposed to be. Nobody takes these Apollo questioners and throw them into jail for their refusal to accept on faith, and more to the point, nobody throws scientists in jail for firing laser beams at the moon and measuring the reflected pulse from the LRRR.

With the holocaust, things are obviously quite different. The mere asking of a question is a jailable offense in many nations, and scientists who have carried out experiments looking for the physical evidence that support the orthodox account are in prison. Why?

Why such a heavy-handed response if those who question the holocaust are as nutty as those who question the Moon landings?

Israel has a world-class once in a lifetime opportunity for Iran's government to self-destruct. LET them hold their investigations. Let them send scientists to the various locations of holocaust history. Let EVERYONE send scientists to the various holocaust locations and let the results of all experiments be published openly.
Let us settle this nonsense once and for all and if Iran is as foolish as the people who think the Moon landings are faked then the world media can ridicule Iran's government out of existence.

But as long as the defenders of the orthodox history of WW2 continue to jail researchers and forbid examination of the facts, the world will continue to wonder: "What are they afraid of?"

"What are they afraid of?"

"What are they afraid of?"

"What are they afraid of?"
Michael Rivero WRH

For a Worldwide Network against War

"We the People Refuse to Fight": Abandon the Battlefield!

Deux articles poussant a s'organiser et creer des reseaux contre la guerre, pour la paix. Cessons d'accepter de nous battre pour une elite psychopathe qui cherche son profit par la destruction de la vie sur Terre.

Aucun commentaire: